SmoothSurfer 10mo ago • 20%
Instead of answering me, it would be much more helpful to come up with an counter argument to mentioned arguments.
We may debate, it wont resolve something. Time will reveal what is needed to be known or to be accepted. So go on have fun, scroll through lemmy.
It is just that, you are lazy so you dont debate and instead you shout out hate. If you are not going to debate and express the opposing side that they are wrong; you are simply an asshole, waste of resources(from my pov of course, it all is relative).
Have a nice day, btw I am an evolutionist(not that it changes sth).
SmoothSurfer 10mo ago • 14%
Why the fuck people did downvote you?!
Many of evolutionists blame those who are against or suspicious about evolution with zealotry but when they come up with real arguments and questions, you become the zealots. You fucking hypocrites
SmoothSurfer 10mo ago • 66%
Its working for me
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 58%
Use gboards with a firewall blocking any traffic from it.
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
This will be last 🥲
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
I appreciate every single second you spent on this, I hope more people will benefit
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
Can you suggest some resources to learn eww
I have never dug into low level things like cpu architectures etc. and decided to give it a try when I learned about [cpu.land](cpu.land). I already was aware of the existence of user and kernel mode but while I was reading site it came to me that "I still can harm my system with userland programs so what does it mean to switch user mode for almost everything other than kernel and drivers?" also we still can do many things with syscalls, what is that stopping us(assuming we want to harm system of course) from damaging our system. [edit1]: grammar mistakes
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 75%
I think what "god" does mean for me, you and others are different. Also same goes for "believe" and "you". I believe, these kinds of topics are way out of our minds' league and even we could comprehend and discuss those things(god, reality, logic etc.) we still would be using wrong tools like language and our current logic system. So both the tools we use, and our intelligence is not enough to answer this question.
But still, if you want a yes or no answer; I would say no without hesitation.
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
Recommendation algorithm does not only consider your watch history. There are other factors.
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 90%
This is the most interesting thing I realize(thanks to you) this week so far
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
You really do understand me. I mean I couldn't find anyone out there, in flesh to speak about these but here I am discussing it with a complete stranger on internet. I really appreciate your effort, thanks again.
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 90%
Actually, some of us didnt
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 90%
https://www.engadget.com/protonmail-climate-activist-ip-swiss-french-authorities-233004304.html
Europol requested it. Even though you think your service is not under 14 eyes there still is gonna be many other problems.
You can always find problems with the service itself.
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
It doesn't matter whether her parenting is true or you were same when you were young. This is your house, those are your possessions; you can do whatever the fuck you want with them, and tell others how to use them or dont use them. So you are not the asshole, indeed your sister seem to be the asshole with still coming to your house like a barfaced even though you are not getting on well with her children.
But if you say that you don't want them anymore if they don't obey your rules she is probably going to piss off considering her barefacedness.
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
Just because of this I have got in the habit of holding phone 45 angles when I open it, and this really puts me in weird situations in morning around people
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 50%
SmoothSurfer 1y ago • 100%
If all federated communities could decide upon to regulate same rules, every one of them could be moderated by their own moderators. But the problem I see here is the things that's being federated is in reality server itself which means it would be impossible(not sure but at least not necessary) to do such a thing. But anyone can easily build an app to collect posts from same communities, it does not require to play with activitypub, just lemmy api.
I know this can be easily searched over internet, but I want to know your experience. I don't want a medium article listing algorithm courses. I found Algorithms from Princeton University in coursera, but course is too old and many resources they have provided are not working right now. I would apprentice it if you could share more of an video type resources because I am not good with programming books, I can not focus them. Thanks in advance...
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/3172656 > Couple of days ago I saw a post about on atheist community about a quote saying atheist can't base their morals on anything. > > I commented that if religion didn't accept some premises like god, they wouldn't either. Some said I am wrong and downvoted me. So I decided to post here about to what extent can I be skeptical about premises, to see where I am mistaken (or commenters). > > Before that post, for a while I had an idea that even the analytical truth/necessary truth (whatever you name it) like "a is equal to a" are premises which can not be proven (since they are the basics of our logic, which will we be in use to prove claims) even though they seem us to be true by intuition. They just have to be accepted to be able to further think about other things. > > So my question is since we can question the correctness of basics of our logic and cant find an answer, we can not justify or learn anything. Also, there lays the problem of do we really understand the same thing from the same concepts, and does language limit us? > > If I am mistaken, which is highly probable, please correct me and don't judge. I am not much of a philosophy reader. > > I would really appreciate it if you could share some resources (video, article, book, anything...) about limits of our understanding, logic, language and related topics. > > Thanks in advance...
Couple of days ago I saw a post about on atheist community about a quote saying atheist can't base their morals on anything. I commented that if religion didn't accept some premises like god, they wouldn't either. Some said I am wrong and downvoted me. So I decided to post here about to what extent can I be skeptical about premises, to see where I am mistaken (or commenters). Before that post, for a while I had an idea that even the analytical truth/necessary truth (whatever you name it) like "a is equal to a" are premises which can not be proven (since they are the basics of our logic, which will we be in use to prove claims) even though they seem us to be true by intuition. They just have to be accepted to be able to further think about other things. So my question is since we can question the correctness of basics of our logic and cant find an answer, we can not justify or learn anything. Also, there lays the problem of do we really understand the same thing from the same concepts, and does language limit us? If I am mistaken, which is highly probable, please correct me and don't judge. I am not much of a philosophy reader. I would really appreciate it if you could share some resources (video, article, book, anything...) about limits of our understanding, logic, language and related topics. Thanks in advance...
