Key misinformation “superspreaders” on Twitter: Older women
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAM
    amzd
    5mo ago 100%

    Out of 650,000

    just 2,107 accounts that are responsible for 80 percent of the tweets linking to sources of misinformation.

    What the fuck?

    37
  • Lewis Hamilton Goes Full Send While Eating Spicy Wings | Hot Ones
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAM
    amzd
    5mo ago 10%

    I think the ethical argument is the strongest.

    “animals getting killed is part of the natural cycle”

    The 80 billion animals a year we kill are in farms and not part of the natural cycle (96% of the land mammals by weight are human or farmed animals) but if you meant to say there is wild animals that kill other animals and that makes it morally correct then what do you think of lions raping each other? Is that now also morally justified?

    -15
  • Is It Possible for Atheists to Have "Objective Morality"?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAM
    amzd
    5mo ago 100%

    In theory you could have a debate but atheism doesn't mandate anything like “you have to believe the same thing as me otherwise you’re not an atheist”

    3
  • Is It Possible for Atheists to Have "Objective Morality"?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAM
    amzd
    5mo ago 100%

    I have been taught animals aren’t things, therefore they are not something but someone.

    The relevant part is that they have their own conscious experience that you are negatively impacting by killing them, the same reason it is wrong to kill a human.

    “The natural order of things” is not a guide for morality; lions rape each other, that is still immoral.

    2
  • Lewis Hamilton Goes Full Send While Eating Spicy Wings | Hot Ones
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAM
    amzd
    5mo ago 22%

    There is two promotion urls in the bio, one for sauce and one that goes to “Frozen Meat, Poultry & Seafood” but even if it was not a paid promotion, it is still normalizing the killing of animals

    -10
  • Is It Possible for Atheists to Have "Objective Morality"?
  • "Initials" by "Florian Körner", licensed under "CC0 1.0". / Remix of the original. - Created with dicebear.comInitialsFlorian Körnerhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearAM
    amzd
    5mo ago 100%

    If you’re reading this and agree please take the next logical step.

    Animal slaughter is wrong because I don’t have the right to deprive someone of their life.

    2
  • 377
    37