Yes that's exactly what I meant, thanks. I dont know how I even got that wrong.

I really like Inheritance Machining and One Big Tony This Old Tony

Damn that's crazy

Anyway

Who's we

I mean this person seems to be not doing it maliciously. As they say, if it wasn't them, it would be someone else. Pushing archive to improve their security is great for everyone. As long as this person doesn't do anything actually malicious, they're in the clear as far as I'm concerned.

I think it would be best if they drew attention to the people who are being horrible, instead of repeating the horrible things they said. So yeah, you're not wrong for thinking this is demeaning.

Compost

They're very clearly joking.

Guillotines are far too clunky.

*if you're paying for a TV license

Dishevelled konsi in a one piece... Shut up and take my awwwws

Yeah, that's what I thought.

FOR GIRLS ONLY. psst... I need a Super Cucumber... You know what its for. Keep it secret, okay?

So to put this in more practical terms, one would neither vote for Hitler or 101% Hitler, and instead vote for The Other Person who Isn't Much Hitler At All, or abstain or something, and protest and take action in other ways?

Hmm. I can understand this perspective. I guess its a bit tough. As a trans person I would find it very hard to do anything that isn't actively working against trump being in power, because if he gets in power it's very likely that my life will be in danger (if I was an American). But at the same time, as mentioned before, it wouldn't be an easy sell for me to be voting pro-harris.

I guess your scenario doesn't mean you're going to vote for trump, just that you'll vote third party or spoil your ballot?

Thanks for the clarity :)

Calling mass shooters a fact of life, implying we can't ban guns, calling climate activists dangerous criminals. But I'm autistic so I can't tell if its sarcasm or if you genuinely hold those beliefs.

This is sarcasm right?

Context:

• I am not an american, so there may be some missing knowledge for me about the american electoral system.
• I abhor Israel's genocide in Gaza, and I abhor the biden administration's support of (and Harris' seeming continued support of) the genocide.
• My understanding is that Trump is just as, if not more supportive of the genocide in Gaza, and on top of this has his sights on doing some truly terrible things in the US re: minorities, trans rights, etc

So with that context, my question is thus: It seems clear that Trump wouldn't change anything about the genocide in Gaza, and that he would bring more evil than the current status quo. So if you're an american voter, you obviously can't let Trump get in. But, Harris is gross to vote for as well, even if its a "lesser of the two evils" thing. What do you do? As far as I understand its basically one or the other, you dont really have any third party to vote for right?

I didn't say they don't serve a purpose, I said that customers didn't ask for it/don't want it. I also said AI, not LLM (initially).

They serve a purpose, but in many cases are not well suited or ready for production.

Examples?

I use a food delivery app that added an AI chatbot to supposedly help you with restaurant and food suggestions, and it wasn't able to handle simple dietary restrictions (whereas standard filtering options on the search work just fine). A prompt as simple as "I'm looking for restaurants with vegan sandwiches" would return places that had vegan food and/or sandwiches. Even if it worked properly, just having adequate filter options and robust search is far more suited to the kinds of things users are doing on this kind of app.

Search engines putting their in-house LLM generated slop above actual search results, which is the equivalent of ensuring that the first search result is from a garbage site with hit or miss accuracy of information or relevance to the topic. I don't imagine it will be long before we start to see generative ai image results being served on the fly by in-house products when you search for images. Pass the user query to an LLM to generate a prompt for image gen, then pass that to image gen and bam! Slop!

Every fucking product has some stupid gradient-coloured ✨ AI button shoved into it now and it drives me up the wall.

Putting LLM auto complete into IDEs? Great, as long as I can turn it off and as long as they're not training it on the code I write in the IDE. AI denoising in rendering software? Excellent. Image infill/outfill using AI in photo editing and drawing software? Spot on.

Well for one, the clickbait BS has become worse because of the LLMs :P I think its cool tech, don't get me wrong. Before it started getting shoved into every product and before its environmental impact started skyrocketing, I was keenly interested in it. In all honesty, I still am, but I'm keenly interested in what happens with it after the bubble pops and the real use cases are left behind. Text summarisation and code prediction are two genuine use cases I've seen have tremendous success. But I don't need an LLM built into every product I use, and I don't need every product I use to be training LLMs.