Sure, appetite drops a bit in that specific person, but this still doesn't do anything to motivate the big food industry to change its ways - they can assume that specific person will still eat their products, and can carry on selling ultra-processed food to everyone else

Isn't the dystopian bit of this the scary capitalism of it? This approach allows the food industry to continue selling people crap that is making them unhealthy rather than reforming their business model, and it's doing this by handing a massive amount of money to the pharma industry. This is exactly the solution I'd want if I were a wealthy investor with money in lots of vast global businesses, and for me that's the dystopian bit - the way it's all about handing money to The Man to continue unhealthy lives rather than, y'know, fix anything a bit

I'm guessing that's Venus

Drivers

I'd be very intrigued in a system that lets me leave my phone in my (waterproof) pocket and access audio and navigation on Bluetooth. Let's get this on bikes asap

Now imagine that, but onions

One of my big worries with the way people are using LLMs is that they're being trained to trust whatever they spit out. Hey Google, what's the nutritional content of peanuts? And people are learning not to ask where the information came from or to check sources.

One of the many reasons this worries me is that very soon these businesses are going to need to recoup the billions they're spending, and I wonder how long until these systems start feeding paid promotions to a population that's been trained to accept whatever they're told. imagine what some businesses, or governments, would pay to have exactly their choice of words produced on demand in response to knowledge queries.

Interestingly, my family subscription more or less halved a few months ago, which I was NOT expecting, but which was very welcome

Agreed. although my worry with the closed-list system is that it makes parties, not people, the main thing we vote for. This feels like a barrier to entry for independents, and a way of propping up the power of established parties. It also feels like it removes voters' ability to reject a politician that happens to be popular within the party, or to support a more maverick politician who doesn't toe the party line but who resonates with the public.

This is greenwashing. Global aviation uses almost 100 billion gallons of fuel per year. If we even began to address a fraction of that with magic new fuels (which won't happen) it would require incredible amounts of growing, and if we had that sort of amount of agricultural capacity available on this planet, capable of producing crops at a price the aviation industry is prepared to pay, we wouldn't have any hunger on the world.

Don't fall for this. There isn't such a thing as green aviation. I'm not saying there should be no flying, but we can't carry on as we are and magic away the consequences. In particular, don't fall for the snake oil salesmen trying to distract you with appealing non-solutions

Hard to get too excited when Norway funds all this by selling fossil fuels

It would have a massive effect. Transport (car) emissions are one of the larger - and growing - sources of emissions.

And we can't hide behind "But the corporations..." because ultimately what they produce gets used by us.

So to answer your question: riding a bike when Global Capital wants you to keep buying cars and pumping oil into them is one of the best acts of defiance you can make

If it's a tiny bit of comfort, you probably don't need a new derailleur, just a new cassette with the right spacing. The mech itself will likely work with different cable-pull, as long as you're not drastically changing the number of sprockets on the cassette

If people are driving with appropriate skill and care, the number driving into large, well-lit buildings should be approximately zero per year. It sounds like you're willing to excuse a lot of bad driving

There's a substantial body of research on how mythbusting lies can be counterproductive because as part of doing so, you repeat the lie and this helps people remember it.

Also, and this is more speculative, but surely there's probably some survivor bias here? There are probably many thousands of populists neither of us has ever heard of because they haven't had their voices amplified.

Don't give these people publicity

Plumbers don't carry massive heavy plant. But I know you were just picking a concrete example of a business there so let's not dwell on that particular case. The real point is that if a business causes damage to the roads that has to be repaired, it should contribute an appropriate amount. If that makes the cost of doing business more expensive, that just has to get passed on to the customer - who, ultimately, is the one having the heavy stuff transported

Here in the UK, I've seen bloody sushi restaurants and hairdressers drive branded pickup trucks FFS. No tax exemptions for businesses. As another poster noted, the damage is being done and needs to be paid for - it doesn't magically not matter because it was done in the course of somebody using the road for their business

Please, people, don't buy cheap ebikes from Amazon's, AliExpress, etc. Buy from a reputable brand and dealer.

Apparently the surge pricing reflected what touts would have charged. Makes you want to grab somebody and shout HOW IS THAT A JUSTIFICATION?! Yeah, and if somebody steals a car they'll sell it to me cheaper than the dealer - so it feels like TM logic means the dealer should sell it to me cheaper too because that's what the black market is priced at?