OOTL: I'm confused. What is this? I've been using Firefox for years and I have no idea what this button is/was or why people would be annoyed by it.

What part is overwhelming for you?

It kind of just feels like compounding complexity. The projects themselves require a lot more steps and sometimes resources from around the map. Plus with all the increased throughput we get from upgraded miners and belts doing things at scale involves a LOT of machines. So the numbers kind of keep ballooning as we also need to handle a lot of different inputs.

Then there are all the old inefficient factories which I should tear down/upgrade, but it's just really daunting knowing just how much I'm gonna have to add to make it all efficient.

Overprovision everything so I guarantee there’s enough everywhere.

Honestly that's what I started doing at some point. Just try to overestimate so hopefully I don't need to do more math.

The links didn’t work either. But thanks for the suggestions. I’ll look into other app options.

It depends. Usually I’m just looking for some game or show I like. The few of those I’ve looked into that have a community have like a handful of users, infrequent posts, or auto-posted threads with no comments beyond the bot post.

EDIT: Also, do you know how to get to your link on Memmy? For me it just brought me back to the main feed.

The only real issue I have is that there aren’t that many active communities for more niche topics. I hope it’ll get there someday, but for now we have Linux or Star Trek, take your pick. :P

Did it really predict these things? We’ve had data surveillance and algorithmic targeting for a while before Watchdogs. A lot of “prescient” sci-fi is just writing about stuff that’s already happening but which people don’t pay much attention to.

I was thinking about this recently when I had to look at a website without an ad blocker. (Btw, does anyone know an Adblock option that works for iOS Lemmy? Memmy’s browser doesn’t block anything.)

The website was absolutely packed to the brim with ads. Animated, expanding, moving, etc. All competing for your attention. How can ANY of those ads be getting enough attention for it to be worth it?

Yeah. It’s not hard to see why people don’t trust the media anymore. Amongst other things, the big ones I can think about in my life: They uncritically parroted lies the government used to justify the Iraq War and they regularly gave equal air time/consideration to climate deniers as though they were equivalent to climate scientists.

It’s still crazy to me how much of the bad shit the government has done has been declassified and publicly available and people still just kind of ignore it. Who needs censorship when people are just willing to overlook reality? Or even worse, just make up nonsense.

Plagueleech.

I went to a restaurant recently that had fried cauliflower in a sesame sauce or something. It was pretty good and I normally don’t like cauliflower.

Gender: beef jerky.

It’s mostly just finding some reviews/word of mouth sources that you trust and which align with your tastes.

On the review side of things Second Wind covers a decent spread of indie games. I also occasionally see some new stuff from streamers, but that’s more of a toss up since there’s a lot of sponsored coverage.

I know you're joking and that there's a lot of garbage videos out there, but what possible value would there be in sending a novel per second? Can anyone read a novel per second? It only makes sense to use the higher bandwidth to send higher density information like video, audio, or interactive media like games.

My adblocking doesn’t work on twitch anymore, so I stopped using it for everything but one streamer I’m subbed to.

Tis the season for floating stuff in drinks. Summer by contrast is the season for putting stuff on the glass of your drink.

Even if that were true, you know what would make them not look bad? Doing the right thing in the first place.

EDIT:

Think about this from the reverse perspective: If you wanted to maximize your chances at success, it’s better to maximize the potential cost to businesses and governments for not listening to you.

The perspective of “You’re making us look bad by… showing the ways we’re not doing good.” Is a really backwards, elite-oriented way of understanding politics. Politicians are in theory supposed to serve the people, not the other way around.

I tried both and I just couldn’t get past the initial complexity wall. After the tutorials the game kind of just leaves you like”good luck, figure it out.” And I still don’t even know what I’m supposed to be doing.

I had wildly different experiences with teachers within my own schools growing up. There was legitimately no standard that valued this kind of nuanced exploration of the world. Just a focus on standardized tests. It was almost entirely on the individual teachers to spend more of their time and effort to go any further than that.

I had some great teachers that made everything interesting and taught us more like the classes I eventually had in college, but I definitely have had more that were like this one math teacher I remember who, when I asked about why we had to do a math problem in a specific way we were learning about, answer something along the lines of “because I say so.”

And if it took ads on the pause screen to get you to see the issues with growth capitalism,

I don't know why you'd assume that. I'm pretty staunchly communist from a mix of seeing our current problems and understanding history enough to know that this didn't start yesterday. But if it takes companies being really obviously greedy for some consumers to see anything is wrong, it doesn't hurt to try to focus their anger to a productive understanding of the problem rather than whatever other nonsense they might get drawn to.

As far as alternatives. I'm always up front with people in saying that I don't have precise answers for what our future ought to be after capitalism. That's a difficult problem and up to everyone to work together to figure that out. But there is no future where we stick with capitalism. Or at least, not one we'd want to live in for very long. It's a cruel system and it's going to be responsible for ending the human habitable environment if we don't do something about that. People need to understand this and they need to understand that tweaking around the edges isn't going to fix the issue.

The thing about if they were ok with a reasonable profit is a thought experiment or rhetorical device more than it's a proposed solution. It'd be nice if it worked that way. Capitalists want us to think things do or could work that way. Hence corporations saying they NEED to cut costs or raise prices while continuing to make increasing profits. But it's important to understand why it could never work that way, at least for very long.